Boats and jet skis that can cause serious injury if defective include canoes, kayaks, rowboats, sailboats, fishing boats, jet skis like jet skis, pontoons, speedboats, houseboats, yachts, and cruisers, in other words They run the gamut from simple, non-motorized crafts to exotic luxury coatings. The product liability law applies equally to all these ships and boats. Jet skis present most of the same problems as other jet ski products, as well as many of the other faulty motor vehicles such as automobiles.
Because many product liability cases involving boats and vessels arise from injuries caused not by products designed or manufactured in a defective way, but by products that are potentially dangerous if used incorrectly, plaintiffs often base their claims on theory. not to warn. If the case is based on an assertion that the product is defective or that the manufacturer breached its duty to warn, the plaintiff cannot recover unless he can prove that the defect or failure actually caused the injury.
Boat and boat manufacturers have a duty to warn potential users of the potential dangers of their products. However, that duty generally does not apply to hazards that are obvious or known, rather than covert. ATV decals example, a sailboat manufacturer may not have an obligation to warn against navigation during inclement weather. Sellers and reconditioners of dangerous products can also be held liable for failing to warn because, like manufacturers, they are in a better position than consumers to control the dangers of product defects.
As in all product liability cases, the boat and vessel manufacturer has a variety of defenses, such as arguing that the alleged defect was not the immediate cause of the injury, the plaintiff contributed or was relatively negligent, the plaintiff assumed the risk , the plaintiff misused the product, the plaintiff altered or modified the product, or the defendant complied with all applicable industry and safety standards. However, some other defenses are specific to the context of the boat, such as the operator carrying a passenger in a boat intended for a single person. The plaintiff can counter this argument by claiming that the vehicle's design gives the appearance that passengers are permitted, even when warning decals state otherwise . https://www.klpcustoms.com/
0 Comments